Monday, March 19, 2012

[YouTube-API] Re: Removing Restriction of API Access to a User's Messages

Hello Nick,

It's very unlikely that this is going to happen, barring a complete
reversal of the engineering team's priorities. I'm sorry to
disappoint.

Cheers,
-Jeff Posnick, YouTube API Team
groups.google.com/group/youtube-api-gdata | apiblog.youtube.com |
@YouTubeDev


On Mar 17, 9:36 pm, Nick <nickfrey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please improve the messages APIs. While I understand that it isn't a
> priority<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/youtube-api-gdata/9No_aQxf8XQ/discu...>of YouTube to add full functionality to the messages API, I am strongly
> requesting that the following revisions be made so that a useful inbox
> experience can be provided by third-party applications.
>
> First, I'd like to reiterate, in its simplest form, the messaging system
> which YouTube provides on its website. YouTube provides a system that
> allows a user to *send* text to another user. The target user then visits
> their inbox and *receives* that message. Now, add a *subject* field, and
> finally, an attach a video field. YouTube.com also has other useful types
> of messages you can receive in the inbox -- videos shared with you, and
> notifications regarding comments on your videos, comment replies, and video
> responses.
>
> Currently, the APIs provided for third-party applications to interface with
> this messaging system are very limited. They allow developers to access the
> videos others have shared with a user, allow users to share videos with
> others in their contacts, and delete received messages. The issue is that
> the API doesn't provide communication at its most basic level: sending a
> simple textual message to another user, and allowing them to receive and
> view that message. It exposes seemingly the least useful feature in
> YouTube's messaging system to developers.
>
> According to this thread<https://groups.google.com/d/topic/youtube-api-gdata/6NFCqHx_Nms/discu...>,
> the reasoning behind this is to combat spam. However, I feel that spam can
> be just as much of a problem with the "shared with you" system as anything
> else, the only difference is the spammer needs to include a video with the
> message. In addition, the API doesn't allow you to retrieve simple messages
> in a user's inbox from YouTube.com, which should be available.
>
> I also noticed a strange inconsistency: messages with videos attached
> aren't able to be received in the API either, only strictly videos "shared
> with you" are.
>
> So, in summary, I'm requesting that the following functionality be added to
> the YouTube Data API:
>
>    - Sending of messages with a subject and any message body (with or
>    without a video attached).
>    - Allowing the feed to return the full inbox of a user, including
>    comments, video responses, and normal messages without a video attached.
>    - Retrieval of video responses, and the ability to approve or ignore
>    them.
>
> I realize that the response I'd typically receive for this type of post
> would be a link to the improvements / issues page on Google Code to submit
> a request. I've already taken the liberty of doing so. Please respond with
> your thoughts. I really want to create a fully-functional YouTube
> experience for users, but leaving out core functionality from the API
> doesn't allow me to do so.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/gdata-issues/issues/detail?id=2849
>
> Thank you.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "YouTube APIs Developer Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to youtube-api-gdata@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to youtube-api-gdata+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/youtube-api-gdata?hl=en.

No comments:

Post a Comment