an extra (thin) layer of code between you and the video.
If you're seeing the HTML5 video player in the iframe, then I would
expect load to be lower.
Tim Wintle
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 16:56 -0800, vladimir wrote:
> I've been working on a project that uses Youtube's javascript api
> using the flash object embed method (swfObject embed), but today
> learned that I can use the iframe player api and use HTML5 version. It
> sounded awesome because getting rid of Flash would mean lower cpu
> usage....at least that's what I thought.
>
> Anyway I worked on it for a while and turned it into an html5 version,
> but the cpu usage hasn't changed that much. Actually in most cases it
> seems it's even higher. I understand there are other benefits of using
> HTML5 player, but my highest expectation was on the low resource usage
> part, so I am quite disappointed.
>
> Maybe I did something wrong? Can anyone who implemented iframe api
> share their experience in terms of cpu usage? I'm thinking about going
> back to swfObject, since that seems more stable.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "YouTube APIs Developer Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to youtube-api-gdata@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to youtube-api-gdata+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/youtube-api-gdata?hl=en.
No comments:
Post a Comment